Wednesday, May 05, 2010

The Difference Between Being A Performer And Being An Entertainer

Smooth Jazz Guitarist Peter White who started out his career playing as a keyboard player and guitarist for 70's recording artist Al Stewart once told me that moving from being just a performer to an entertainer made a huge difference in his career.

What's the difference? Well, anyone can play a musical instrument and be a performer. But an entertainer also works the crowd. By this I mean knowing how to get your audience involved in your performance. Little things like inviting them to participate in your performance can make you a better entertainer.

For instance, if you are a guitarist, you can play your guitar and simply stand there not moving. Now technically, the sound may be just great. But does your audience enjoy watching you? Are they involved on more levels than just listening to your music? Do they get a good visual feast as well?

Too often I watch musicians play and they are just plain boring to watch. I enjoy listening to their music. But wow... are they boring to watch. Just standing there and playing does not cut it.

On the other hand, some entertainers aren't all that special when it comes to their music. But if you watch them, they are fun to see! They might be dancing around, jumping up and down... really getting into their music. Well, they've taken something that is not so great on a musical level and made it a little more interesting.

You might say that this is not really good musically speaking. Perhaps so. But I'll bet you anything that having a good stage show can help your career. Think about how many musical acts out there today that aren't all that great musically, but they are making a ton of money because people come out to see their shows. Why? Well, I'll bet it is because they are great entertainers... not necessarily great performing musicians.

Is this selling out your music? I don't think so. I personally think sometimes that a good stage presence is just as important as being a good musician. Think about it... if you are going to play IN FRONT of people, not only will they have to listen to your music, but they are going to be watching you too. If you can't deliver both on a visual level as well as a auditory level, then you should only be a recording artist and have people listen to your recordings. Don't go out to play live. Because a live performance needs to be entertaining on both levels.

Just my two cents. :) (Edit note: Excellent comment in the comment section. Be sure to check that out! Also see what other musicians have to say on the topic by visiting the acousticguitarforum.com by clicking here.)

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is a very interesting topic to me, as it's something I've found myself thinking about recently. I don't think it's necessarily about jumping up and down or a visual feast, but it's definitely about engaging with the audience, and having a presence on stage. That presence could be a gentle presence or an exuberant presence - but whatever it is, it makes the live performance something that the audience feels part of and can relate to.

Fliss

russlowe said...

Excellent point Fliss! It doesn't require lots, but it does need to engage the audience. Thanks! :)